tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8518558863257342788.post582001502270572868..comments2024-03-05T02:38:51.868-08:00Comments on Theoretical Physics previously quantum art and poetry: Einstein said “for us physicists the distinction between past, present and future is only an illusion”. Could he have been wrong?Art and Poetryhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01991284507367796696noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8518558863257342788.post-7894642483159283552010-08-16T06:57:52.588-07:002010-08-16T06:57:52.588-07:001) Nothing would exist without light or EMR becaus...1) Nothing would exist without light or EMR because EMR is an innate part of matter. In this theory we all have our own independent reference frame or spacetime. That will have its own rate of time relative to our energy or mass we will be able to interact (free-will) with other reference frames forming our own future spacetime because this is a continuous process! We see our Universe moment by moment or photon by photon because the wave-function is continuously collapsing and reforming forming the arrow of time.<br />2) In this theory light are waves of EMR and the quantization of light into photons take place when the waves come in contact with electrons on the surface of atoms. That’s why it’s called Quantum Atom Theory. Modern physics has no understanding of why we have a future and a past this theory can give us a scientific reason and in doing so explain the paradoxes of Quantum Mechanics.Art and Poetryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01991284507367796696noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8518558863257342788.post-49606855745677413132010-08-14T16:33:38.915-07:002010-08-14T16:33:38.915-07:00Interesting, but I must say I disagree with most o...Interesting, but I must say I disagree with most of it.<br /><br />I find it interesting, because, merging the spiritual with the physical is something I've previously dabbled with, at a higher spiritual level.<br /><br />But I have a few points.<br /><br />1) In your model, would time exist without light? Time is related to mass... the more massive an object A relative to another B, the slower time flows on B relative to A. Light is massless. Are you proposing that light is simply the carrier of the time force? I'm not sure that would stand up in standard particle physics.<br /><br />2) I was told about the dulaity of light very simply not so long ago. Light comes in particles - no doubt! The wave we see is just the motion of the particle. Motion is a wave. Not light it's self.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17216088505748775811noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8518558863257342788.post-52975782546817466202010-08-11T23:38:28.945-07:002010-08-11T23:38:28.945-07:00I would like to exchange links with your site quan...I would like to exchange links with your site quantumartandpoetry.blogspot.com<br />Is this possible?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com