Question and Answers on an artist theory of ‘time’ as a physical process

Video on Quantum Atom Theory

I am on the World Wide Web promoting my theory on light and time. The basic principles of this theory are very simple and the whole theory is based on just two postulates:

1. Is that the quantum wave particle function Ψ or probability function represents the forward passage of time itself quanta by quanta!

2. Is that Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle ∆×∆p×≥h/4π that is formed by the w-function is the same uncertainty we have with any future event within our own ref-frame that we can interact with turning the possible into the actual!

This theory is based on just one equation (E = ˠ M˳C² )∞ the Lorentz contraction ˠ of space and time is between the energy and mass. The greater the energy the greater the contraction of space and the slower time will run. Mass will increase relative to this and each ref-frame can be seen as a vortex in space formed by the rate that time flows. The C² represents light radiating out in all directions at a constant speed forming a sphere 4π of electromagnetic potential. The brackets represent the boundary condition of the ref-frame formed by the energy and the infinity symbol ∞ represents an infinite number of dynamic ref-frames that make up our Universe.

This is some interesting question I have been asked about this theory. Some of the questions are very abstract but I have tried to make the answer as simple and straight forward as possible.

Question:

 I'm still very interested in your theory, for there is something beautiful about it, and there may, indeed, be something to it, but I don't think it tells us a lot about the question of "free will," per se. Another example comes to mind at the level of a billiard ball that has been struck, for example. Your theory may show us something about the forward chain of events, but what does it tell us about the "free will" of the billiard ball?

Answer:

The movement of billiard balls can be based on classical physics. This is an approximation of quantum physics. The process explained in this theory is universal a billiard ball will have its own ref-frame relative to its energy or momentum. The rate that time flows within this ref-frame will be relative to this energy. A game of billiards is always played over a period of time! When billiard balls strike each other, the charged fields of the two balls repel each other if it was not for their electrical charge they could pass right through each other. The carrier of the electromagnetic force that forms movement of charge is the photon. Therefore we can see time unfolds photon by photon even for billiard balls.

Question:

I would use more aspects of modern physics to further validate the claims displayed. I also recommend making the distinction between the mind & the brain, that mind is fundamental to the brain & not the other way around, as that is a good subway into framing consciousness as elemental to reality.

Answer:

In this theory we all have our own reference frame therefore we all have our own individual or personal view of life. Is it this personalization of the brain that gives us our idea of mind?

Question:

 Yes that is absolutely true. Everyone has a Subjective Reality, (in which each person's view of everthing is filtered through their own personal reference frame), and then there is Objective Reality, (in which everyone of us participates and tries to understand logically, but possesses its own Absolute Reference Frame). The important point I believe about our minds is that as an intelligent Energy it can never be destroyed, even After brain death occurs. So minds must predate physical reality.

Answer:

This is what I believe also “minds must predate physical reality” this makes sense because the ability for consciousness must have existed in the Universe from the very beginning for consciousness to have evolved.

If we think of electromagnet activity in the brain forming consciousness then it is only a form of light waves and consciousness is the most advanced part of a universal process.

Question:

The only way I can see for SP to work, is for local fields to be distorted for 'inertial frames' moving at high relative speeds. But why do the effects of acceleration in normal everyday terrestrial frames become redundant once the acceleration stops, and the moving frame is travelling at constant speed. Although this seems paradoxical, I think there has to be a simple answer to this. Are the forces we experience due to acceleration in normal terrestrial situations due to differential forces.

Answer:

This is a very interesting question: “why do the effects of acceleration in normal everyday terrestrial frames become redundant once the acceleration stops, and the moving frame is travelling at constant speed” In this theory the answer is very simple at constant speed there is constant energy and therefore no variation in time dilation.

Question:

But upon observation (light-wave hitting the eye etc) wave-function collapses right? And also the wave-function of the other entangled particle collapses instantly. So is information transmitted superluminally. Seems like it! So strange...

Answer:

It should not seem strange if we think of it as a continuous dynamic process that forms the geometry of spacetime. We see and feel this process as the continuum of time with an Arrow of Time for each individual object or observer within their own ref-frame.

Question:

 May be it is possible. The whole reality could be continuous-spread out like a wave present everywhere. It may be our consciousness which is a discontinuous process meaning consciousness samples "the whole reality" in front of it at regular intervals. Because sampled pieces of "reality" are part of the "whole reality" it can be thought of as a particle and wave both, no ?

I am trying to understand too...forgive me if I didn't make sense :)

Answer:

This is true in a way because consciousness or the observer can see ‘the whole reality’ in the sense that we see many different reference frames at the same time all reacting with each other. This can be seen is the Two Slit Experiment it has its own ref-frame until an observer turns on a detector and collapses the light waves.

Question:

 I try to imagine entangement a locational spherical rings series sine wave-front's of future probability, cascading down compressing wave amplitude input +0/1- output, decompressing eXpanding sphere's dissipating gravity. Input +0/1-output oscillating Harmonically.

A wave-chain reaction between an infinite amount opposing vorticies, a cosmic sea harmonically oscillating mirroring spherical symmetries all around me, before coming contact with my eye, condensing and being made neural

Answer:

A good way to imagine entanglement is to look at ripples on the surface of water. As each ripple expands out it is entangled relative to the centre of the ripple. If the ripples are formed by raindrops falling on the surface of the water you can think of each raindrop as a photon of light! And think of the photon as a new moment in time within the ref-frame of the ripple.

Question

 I dont get what you mean by infinities in the heart of calculus and curves... can you explain what that has to do with anything?

Answer:

In this theory human mathematics is based on the geometry of this one universal process. The infinities in the heart of calculus and in Cantor’s continuum hypothesis are because this process forms a potential infinity of possibilities. We see and feel this process as the continuum of time.
 A mathematician will form his own reality relative to his actions or energy, mass and momentum just like any other object in our Universe. Therefore it is only logical that he will be able to divide it into infinitely smaller parts finding infinities in calculus.

~