Saturday, 28 January 2012

An artist interpretation of quantum physics as the physical process that forms the flow of time.

An artist theory on the Quantum Mechanics and the physics of time.



It has been said that a good theory should be based on just a few postulates and explain a large number of phenomenon.
This theory is based on just two simple postulates and helps to explain many of puzzles of quantum and classical physics.


1. The first postulate is that the quantum wave particle function Ψ explained by Schrodinger’s wave equation represents the forward passage of time ∆E ∆t ≥ h/2π or Arrow of Time itself photon by photon


2. The second postulate is that Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle ∆×∆p×≥h/4π that is formed by the wave function is the same uncertainty we have with any future event that we can interact with turning the possible into the actual!


The quantum wave particle function Ψ is a probability wave of a potential future event within an individual reference frame.
We have an infinite number of reference frames in our Universe each one having a rate that time flows relative to the energy of that individual reference frame. This idea of an infinite number of ref-frames is explained by Einstein in his theories on relativity.


This theory (Quantum Atom Theory) unites Einstein’s theories of relativity and quantum physics explaining a physical process of continuous energy exchange. This process forms the geometry or curvature of spacetime in Einstein’s theories of relativity and what we see and feel as the flow of time in our everyday life.

I have been promoting this theory on the Internet on sites like YouTube and this is some of the most recent comments and question I have had:


Comment
Okay, from your examples I can see how time might be considered the hidden variable. However, there may be BRANES embedded in the fabric of space that are responsible for both time and quantum entanglement. Accelerating objects may rub against these branes, producing time dilation. Light itself may use branes as a conduit. Branes would also affect all matter in the universe,acting as a scaffold for such,and Branes would also be responsible for the wave function collapse, setting the position.


Answer

The idea of branes is promoted in the book “The Elegant Universe” by Brian Greene its part of String Theory.
In this theory we have boundary conditions instead of (BRANES). They are dynamic and we see them has the two 2π dynamic dimensions of a past and a potential future uncertainty. Mathematically we see this as Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle ∆×∆p×≥h/4π. This process forms the rate that time ∆t flows it will be relative to the energy ∆E of each individual ref-frame. We have an infinite number of ref-frames so we only need three 4π dimensions and one variable time

∆E ∆t ≥ h/2π


Comment
"Objects of great mass create time dilation"---this may be due to gravity creating a compression,which brings the matter closer to fundamental branes that exist in the fabric of space.Accelerating objects may also come into contact with these branes, producing time dilation.Quantum entanglement may occur on the surface of branes. Once established, the entanglement can persist through the conduit of branes, since the branes are frozen, ultra rigid sheets.Branes may convey energy in a timeless way


Answer
Einstein believed is a dynamic Universe that is objective and would relate to our everyday life. This theory is trying to explain such a Universe. We do not have branes in our everyday life, but we have boundary conditions in the form of reference frames. In a dynamic Universe of continuous change or energy exchange this is all we need to form a logical picture of our Universe.


Comment
Brane, Branes, Branes. They may exist within the human body, allowing us to collapse the wave function.

Answer
The wave function is spherical 4π forming a three dimensional space. Therefore we have 4π in Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle ∆×∆p×≥h/4π of position and momentum.
HUP can be reformulated as uncertainty between energy ∆E and time ∆t forming the equation ∆E ∆t ≥ h/2π. The surface of the sphere 4π forms a dynamic two dimensional 2π boundary condition that we see and feel as a future and a past within our own ref-frame.
No Branes!!!


Comment
My surmise is that momentum and position are separate (not simultaneously definable) because momentum is separate from branes, which actually define position. Collapsing energetic momentum to a singular point defines position, and that position is located on a brane. In the realm of pure momentum, branes are remote, existing outside of that domain.


Answer
Momentum is frame dependent and is only relative within its own reference frame. An observer will observer from the position of his own reference frame. In a dynamic Universe of continuous change the outcome is always uncertainty ∆×∆p×≥h/4π between position and momentum.
Observation is always a process over a period of time ∆E ∆t ≥ h/2π and we have uncertainty between energy ∆E and time ∆t as the future unfolds photon by photon.


Comment
Light exists partially on a brane, and partially not. That accounts for particle/wave duality.

Answer
In this theory we have a dynamic Universe of continuous change we are all wave and waves by their nature have to move. We see and feel this movement as the flow of time ∆t. This will be relative to our own energy ∆E within our own ref-frame. Everything is made up of infinite number of w-functions forming an infinite number of ref-frames. Particle or new photon oscillations are formed when the w-function comes in contact with atoms forming a new light waves or w-functions of future probability.


Question
Time is infinite, it is circular... between 1 and 2 is an infinite amount of decimals rational and irrational I could say 1.111 and repeat the one forever when it gets to 2 is a mystery to me... I believe it's the mind that brings the concept of time into existence, we perceive it differently then other creatures one moment can seem to stand still and one can pass without notice. It is a record of change... how time works and why it does I just can't fathom...


Answer
Yes you could say 1.111 and repeat the one forever and never get to two! But only as a process over a period of time, in this theory the flow of time is formed by the continuous flow of light or EMR within each individual ref-frame. In this theory consciousness is the most advanced part of a universal process and can therefore perceive this process as the flow of time with a past and a potential uncertain future within each individual reference frame.


Comment
This is rubbish


Answer
Even rubbish has its own energy or mass within its own reference frame. The rate that time flows will be relative to the energy or mass of the rubbish within that reference frame! In this theory we form our own time and space within our own reference frame. We are energy and mass and we slow the rate that time flow relative to our energy and mass forming our own future spacetime!

Comment
Well, abstract mathematics is the explaining of paradoxes. Math just follows experimental data the best it can... There is no a priori justification of any mathematical theory. Although, once experiments become able to tackle shadowing of quantum vacuum itself, we will definitely need new mathematical approach. It's never-ending Godel story, really. That's why we like it, right? However, math is but an abstra_ction generated by our mind. Consider natural numbers: 1 leaf, 2 leafs... Good luck :)

Answer
I believe mathematics is based on the geometry of our Universe this geometry is abstract therefore we have abstract mathematics.
Take the quantum Wave particle function it is an inverse sphere “abstract” but if you are within a sphere looking out it would seem inverse. Just like the inverse square law of gravity we are within the gravitational field. I feel that we need a new theory more than a new mathematical approach.


Comment
But if you're deriving it from Ψ, understand that that is something different from the HUP. Ψ (as defined by the Schrodinger equation) has considerably more information than HUP itself does. HUP falls out of the definition of a fourier transform on Ψ when the energy is quantized. I don't really understand how spherical symmetry comes into play here, but i'm not doubting that you can derive entropy if you're given Ψ. I'm doubting that you can derive it with HUP alone.

Answer
Yes Ψ has considerably more information than HUP! Ψ represents the flow of time itself in this theory and there are always considerably more possibilities than there are actual physical outcomes. This is a process you need Ψ the flow of time to form future potential uncertainty HUP with the flow of entropy. Ψ is an inverse sphere and we have the inverse square law of gravity because of this geometry


Comment
Free Will is the ability to collapse the wave function by intent.


Answer
In this theory first there is the conscious idea this form the intent, but it is physical action that collapses the w-function within an individual reference frame. A house brick will do the same within its own reference frame when light waves come in contact with it without any intent because the process is universal!


Question
Forgive me if I'm wrong, but isn't Heisenberg's uncertainty Principle;∆×∆p×≥h/2πAnd not;∆×∆p×≥h/4πI don't know, so it's just a question asked, not criticism. I've read alot about theoretical and mathematical physics, but I study biomedicin, so it's not really my field. It is however, one of my greatest hobbies, so I'm trying to learn as well as I can :)


Answer
HUP can be set up in two ways the uncertainty of position and momentum ∆×∆p×≥h/4π and also uncertainty between energy and time ∆×∆p×≥h/2π. It’s a great hobby to have!

Question
Somebody explain...is entanglement like a connection?


Answer
Entanglement is a property of any kind of waves. If you look at ripples on the surface of water you will see that the ripples are entangled. They have the same up or down movement simultaneously as they expand out from the centre of the ripple. The w-function of quantum mechanics is the same it forms a square of probability. It is just that it is three dimensional, spherical 4π and forms the flow of time ∆t within an individual reference frame.

Comment
IF entropy is a consequence of the HUP, then you should be able to derive entropic laws from HUP. If it's impossible to derive entropy from HUP alone, then the arrow of time is not a consequence of HUP alone.


Answer
This theory does just that! HUP is formed by the quantum wave particle function Ψ explained by Schrödinger’s wave equation this has spherical symmetry. This spherical symmetry forms the organization for the spontaneous continuous universal disorganization of entropy that we have within the Second Law of Thermodynamics.

Question
What if you were in a pitch black room with only sound? Wouldn't time continue to move on? Wouldn't you still be able to hear someone speaking from within the room?


Answer
Many people have asked me this and the answer is that everything radiates light waves of electromagnetic radiation continuously. It is just that our eyes can only see what we call visible light. Most of the electromagnetic spectrum is invisible to us.


Comment
One universal human phenomenon is that the more a phonomena analyzed the more complex it typically becomes. About scale in the universe and the outer edge of spacetime, there is a universal boundary that is defined within our frame of reference as the horizon at which the expansion of spacetime exceeds the speed of light, so that light traveling towards earth from the other side cannot "cross the speed boundary" and will never reach us. .


Answer
I agree in many ways the more we analyze a phenomenon the more complex it typically becomes. This makes sense if we our forming our own spacetime geometry or future. A mathematician will form his own infinities in his mathematic because of this process and no theory will ever be able to explain everything.

~

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thanks for your kind comments, critical comments are also welcome. Be sure to check back in a couple of days to see my response back to your comment, thanks again.