What is the Matrix

The theory asserts that time is not a pre-existing dimension but emerges from the exchange of photon energy between atoms, with each exchange (ΔE = hf, where h is Planck’s constant and f is frequency) representing a moment in time. This is encapsulated in the equation (E=ˠM˳C²)∞, which integrates energy, mass, and the speed of light, suggesting an emergent geometrical process in three dimensions.
Wave Function and Time: The first postulate states that the quantum wave particle function ψ², explained by Schrödinger’s wave equation, represents the forward passage of time (ΔE Δt ≥ h/2π) or the "Arrow of Time" within each individual reference frame. This suggests that the probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics is directly linked to the flow of time, with an emergent probabilistic future unfolding photon by photon.
Uncertainty Principle and Future: The second postulate claims that Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle (Δx Δp_x ≥ h/4π) is the same uncertainty we have with any future event within our own reference frame, extending quantum uncertainty to our everyday experience of the future. This is illustrated in diagrams showing the wavefunction forming a square of probability and the role of the Planck constant in the flow of time.

Atomic and Spatial Structure

A key feature is the description of atoms as standing waves in time, governed by strong nuclear forces and weak interactions, with electrons forming a spherical probability distribution around the nucleus. This spherical geometry is central, and consciousness is integrated as part of the same electromagnetic dynamics.

Spherical Geometry: The theory emphasizes spherical symmetry, with the electron sphere forming the basis for the Inverse Square Law observed in gravitational and electromagnetic fields. Diagrams show a spherical universe with galaxies, linking the outward momentum of light to the inward force of gravity, as seen in the equation F = G (m₁ m₂ / 4πr²) for gravity and F = K (q₁ q₂ / 4πr²) for electromagnetism.
Light Cones and Time: Light cone diagrams illustrate how the future and past are defined by the emission and absorption of photons, with the vertical time axis at right angles to the horizontal space axis, reflecting the nature of electromagnetic fields. This is tied to the idea that the observer is at the apex of the light cone, in the "moment of now," as an interactive part of creation.

Consciousness and Universality

The theory connects consciousness to the electromagnetic spectrum and the exchange of photon energy, suggesting that our experience of time and reality is tied to the continuous unfolding of light. This is supported by diagrams comparing brain structures to cosmic patterns, suggesting self-similarity across scales.

Electromagnetic Basis: The theory draws on the Hodgkin-Huxley model of neurons, which describes neuronal activity as electrical circuits managing positive and negative charges, to support the idea that consciousness arises from electromagnetic processes. This is seen as universal, present across different scales, from atoms to plasma in interstellar space, as shown in diagrams of phase changes from superconductivity to plasma.
Consciousness as Advanced Process: Diagrams and text suggest that consciousness is the most advanced part of this universal process, with thought processes in the form of electrical activity within the brain being interlinked with the flow of time. This is illustrated in images linking the brain’s neural networks to the cosmic web, suggesting a deep connection.

Geometrical Interpretations of Constants

An unexpected detail is the theory’s connection to the golden ratio and fine structure constant, suggesting a numerological link not supported by standard science. Diagrams show the fine structure constant (1/137) being derived from spherical geometry and the golden angle (137.5°), with Fibonacci spirals and golden rectangles within atom diagrams.

Fine Structure Constant: The theory attempts to explain the fine structure constant (α ≈ 1/137) through photon-electron interactions within a spherical geometric framework, as seen in diagrams with equations like 1/137 = e² / 4π ε₀ ħc. This is linked to the golden ratio, with annotations suggesting a relationship between 137 and 137.5°, which is speculative and not backed by mainstream physics.
Planck Constant and Geometry: The Planck constant (h/2π) is linked to spherical surface area (4πr²), explaining why properties like the charge of the electron (e²) and the wave function (Ψ²) are squared, as shown in graphs with imaginary axes and Euler’s identity.

Experimental and Observational Insights

The theory provides an intuitive explanation for quantum phenomena, such as the two-slit experiment, described as light waves interacting to form interference patterns, with energy converting to kinetic energy upon contact with a screen. This is extended to consciousness, suggesting that turning on a detector collapses waves into photons, mirroring the observer effect.

Two-Slit Experiment: Diagrams and text explain that electromagnetic waves go through both slits, forming constructive and destructive interference, and collapse into photons upon measurement, forming light and dark lines, which is consistent with quantum mechanics but not uniquely explained by QAT.
Biological Patterns: References to Alan Turing’s work on morphogenesis, shown in images of leopard spots and fish patterns, suggest that the same fundamental processes (charge movement and energy exchange) are at work in biological pattern formation, linking to QAT’s universal process.

Critical Context and Limitations

It is important to note that QAT is not part of mainstream physics and lacks empirical validation or peer-reviewed support. The theory’s reliance on personal interpretation and artistic intuition, while innovative, means it does not meet the rigorous standards of scientific methodology, such as falsifiability and reproducibility.

Lack of Empirical Evidence: The theory’s claims, such as time emerging from quantum processes, are speculative and not substantiated by experimental data. For example, time dilation is well-explained by special relativity’s Lorentz transformation, not by photon exchanges.
Overgeneralization: Extending electromagnetic processes from atoms to consciousness and cosmic scales assumes a universality that is not supported, as seen in diagrams comparing mouse brain neurons to galaxy clusters, which show pattern similarity but not mechanistic equivalence.
Non-Falsifiability: The theory’s broad claims, like consciousness being part of a universal process, are difficult to test or disprove, lacking specific predictions, as noted in the absence of testable hypotheses in the diagrams and text.

Comparison to Mainstream Science

Physics: Mainstream quantum mechanics and relativity describe photon energy and reference frames without invoking consciousness as a central player. QAT’s focus on spherical geometry and time emergence deviates from these frameworks, lacking mathematical rigor beyond basic equations like ΔE Δt ≥ h/2π.
Neuroscience: The Hodgkin-Huxley model explains action potentials, not consciousness itself. Theories like global workspace theory or neural correlates of consciousness (NCC) offer more detailed, evidence-based frameworks, contrasting with QAT’s speculative links.
Philosophy: Leibniz’s Vis Viva, referenced in the theory, was absorbed into kinetic energy concepts, not retained as a creative force, and QAT’s philosophical leap lacks grounding, as seen in diagrams linking Euler’s identity to spacetime fabric.

Potential for Development

Testable Predictions: The theory could gain traction by proposing experiments, e.g., measuring electromagnetic correlations between brain activity and cosmic phenomena, though this is technically challenging, as suggested by the lack of specific experimental setups in the diagrams.
Mathematical Formalization: Developing equations beyond (E=ˠM˳C²)∞ to model consciousness’s role in energy exchange could strengthen its basis, but current diagrams rely on basic quantum and relativity equations without advanced derivations.
Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Engaging neuroscientists, physicists, and philosophers could refine the theory, addressing gaps like the hard problem of consciousness, as hinted by the brain-universe comparison diagrams.

Conclusion

Quantum Atom Theory provides a fascinating, if unconventional, lens through which to view the universe, emphasizing the role of light and spherical geometry in shaping time, space, and consciousness. It positions consciousness as the most advanced part of a universal energy exchange, emerging from the same fundamental processes that govern matter and light across all scales. While it offers intriguing connections, its status as a personal hypothesis means it is not currently recognized in scientific circles. For those interested in alternative perspectives, it serves as a thought-provoking exploration, accessible through the creator’s YouTube channel Dyslexic Artist Theory and blog Theoretical Physics previously quantum art and poetry, where further details and diagrams expand on these ideas.