## Thursday, 25 April 2013

### The uncertainty of life and nature of reality explained by an artist theory of the physics of time

Video explaining a theory on the physics of time.

﻿

Physics can only explain the uncertainty of life as probability but has no explanation for why we have a future that is always uncertain and a past that can never be changed. I believe the great mistake of physics was not trying to explain this.

This is why we only have a mathematical understanding of quantum mechanics and the nature of reality.

Only by explaining the individual observer as part of an interactive process of continuous energy exchange or continuous creation can we have an objective understanding of the nature of reality.

This is what the video above tries to do by giving us an understanding of ‘time’ as a physical process of continuous energy exchange with the future continuously coming into existence photon by photon!

In this theory we are all in the centre of our own reference frame participating in the creation of the future relative to the energy and
momentum of our own actions.
~

## Monday, 22 April 2013

### Questions answered on the uncertainty of life and Quantum Uncertainty by an artist theory on the physics of ‘time’ as a physical process.

Video explaining Quantum Atom Theory an artist theory on ‘time’ as a physical process.

I am on the World Wide Web promoting my theory on the physics of ‘time’ as a physical process! In this theory ‘time’ is an emergent property with the future continuously coming into existence light photon by light photon.

These are some questions that someone has put forward on YouTube. I have tried to answer these questions as straight forwardly as possible.

Question:

(Dice does not obey "quantum uncertainty".)

Interesting in what way does a dice not obey quantum﻿ uncertainty? Classical physics is an approximation of quantum physics. It is not the other way around everything is based on quantum mechanics!
Einstein’s, said that God does not play dice, but in this theory we are the dice placers in an interactive process of continuous energy exchange.

Question:

When I said a dice, I meant a dice-roll actually. The probability (P(#)) of a certain number (#) to be rolled is independent of any "future" probability or uncertainty of the behavior quanta which makes up the dice. The shape of the dice is what will determine the probability P(#). And ultimately the shape of the dice is determined by the sum of it's quanta, which results﻿ in a pretty static system, explainable without quantum theory.

But if you never had new photons coming into existence relative to the position and momentum of the dice would you have the uncertainty of how the dice will fall? You can say the quantum effects are very neglect-able but what you have to remember﻿ is that this process is unfolding at the speed of light. The dice are moving very slowly relative to this and only if the dice were moving at the speed of light would the process not work and ‘time’ would stop in that ref-frame.

Question:

So you can say that any future event is uncertain, due to quantum﻿ uncertainty. But you can't say that the uncertainty of any event is intrinsically linked with "quantum uncertainty", since a dice is simple system which behaves to it's own intrinsic probabilities. Heisenberg's uncertainty principle is not applicable to anything bigger than quanta like photons and electron.

I see what you are getting at now! In this theory the atoms of the dice have bonded together and are reacting with the light in unison within their own reference frame. The uncertainty of the ﻿dice and the uncertainty of everyday life would not be possible without quantum uncertainty.

Question:

Sure: everything is based on quantum mechanics (not sure, but lets assume),﻿ sure: nothing in life would be possible without quanta and their laws. Sure: classical physics is a approximation of quantum physics, but that doesn't mean that this "quantum uncertainty" is reflected in the object. The only useful description of the interactions of the dice is a classical one. The "quantum uncertainty" (locale vs speed) is not present in the solid big system, when interacting with other big systems.
Anwers:

This is where the process promoted in this theory ﻿comes in it links the “quantum uncertainty” with solid big system like dice. The light photon that is at the heart of quantum uncertainty is also the carrier of the electromagnetic force and electric charge is an innate part of all matter. In this theory the electrical potential forms the future potential uncertainty within an individual ref-frame (like dice) as the future unfolds photon by photon!

Question:

"In this theory the electrical potential forms the future potential uncertainty."
These are just words with no real meaning. You don't really have an explanation for "future potential uncertainty", apart from that it formed by electrical potential (?), photon by photon, which is pretty much nonsense. Your theory shows holes, and you lack of understanding of physics. It does not deserve to be called a theory.﻿ Also electromagnetism (not of quanta) can be described without quantum weirdness.

Not at all it is based on the work of Michael Faraday and electromagnetism does abide to Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle ∆×∆p×≥h/4π of ﻿quantum mechanics. But the important thing is that the photon is the carrier of the EM force and the quanta of quantum mechanics. Therefore the quantum wave particle function Ψ or probability function can represent the forward passage of time itself with the future coming into existence photon by photon.

Question:

What does "turning﻿ the possible into the actual as the future unfolds photon by photon!" mean? Your interpretation does not explain anything. I still don't understand how you theory could possible add to our scientific understanding of the physical world. And electric and magnetic fields are manifestations of the same thing.

This theory gives us an objective understanding to quantum mechanics that is relative to the physical world of our everyday life. This is the form of the atoms (as in dice) interacting with the w-particle duality of light forming a future relative to their energy and momentum! Yes electric and magnetic fields are manifestations of the same thing, but as Michael Faraday said they are changing ﻿in time!

Question:

I still don't see the science in your "theory"; it's complete bogus/philosophy. I understand that you use well know physics, but you don't add anything. You can't use it to predict anything. One of the requirements of a scientific theory is that it must predict something, which is empirically ﻿verifiable.

Based on Science and mathematics, (E=ˠM˳C²)∞ the Lorentz contraction of space and time is between the energy and mass. The greater the energy﻿ the greater the contraction of space and the slower time will run. Mass will increase relative to this and each ref-frame can be seen as a vortex in space formed by the rate that time flows. C² is light radiating out in all directions forming a sphere that can be squared to form the future probability. The brackets represent the boundary condition of the ref-frame within infinity!

Question:

This is how I interpret your question: "if time wouldn't exist, how can anything happen?" The statement doesn't say much. You are saying that photons are creating "time", by a process which you do not explain. (right?) The rest of your comment﻿ seems to be an interpretation of relativity. You say that there would be no time if everything moves at light-speed. But that still doesn't explain the "time creation by photons" part of your so-called theory.

(Wrong!) In the mathematics of Hugh Everett’s many worlds interpretation there are parallel universes all at right-angles to each other. But is this theory we only need three dimensions within a process of continuous energy exchange with the movement of EM fields. The electric fields are always at right-angles to the magnetic fields forming an interactive process that we can interact with turning the possible into﻿ the actual as the future unfolds photon by photon!
Question:

"Time is a hidden variable of﻿ quantum mechanics" erm.. wut?

Yes in this theory the great difference between classical physics and quantum physics is because quantum mechanics represents the physics of ‘time’ as a physical process. The quantum wave particle function Ψ or probability function represents the forward passage of time itself with the future coming into existence  photon by photon. Quantum uncertainty ∆×∆p×≥h/4π﻿ is the same uncertainty we have with any future event within our own ref-frame that we can interact with turning the possible into the actual!

In this theory we have a process of continuous creation continuously coming into existence and we are at the centre of our own ref-frame as an interactive part of that creation! We form our own future relative to the energy and momentum of our own actions. The future only exists as a probability wave Ψ therefore the Planck constant is a constant of action in the process that forms what we see and feel as the flow of time.

Please Rate and Subscribe it will help in the promotion of this theory that will change our view of the Universe and our place within it!

﻿

## Tuesday, 16 April 2013

### Time symmetry and the formation of fractal self similarities within an artist theory on the physics of ‘time’ as a physical process.

This video explains how fractal self similarities are formed.

In this theory fractals are formed by the repetition of the quantum wave particle function or probability function of quantum mechanics continuously collapsing and reforming. A kind of geometrical and therefore mathematical repetition! This has gauge symmetry and we can regauge each new photon at zero representing a new moment it time (the moment of now) with the positive numbers marching off towards an infinite future, their negative numbers recede towards a limitless past (the positive and negative of EMW). This gives us a deeper understanding of how Time is formed and a reason why we have a future and a past. This process has the geometry of spacetime that the mathematics of fractal self similarities our based upon. We have infinite complexity upon the boundary of a fractal. No matter how much we magnify a fractal we will still see new patterns new images emerging.
In this theory this is because we have an interactive process the fractal is only relative to actions of the mathematician. We have a process of continuous creation or change creating an infinity of possibilities at every degree and angle of creation that we can interact with turning the possible into the actual!

## Thursday, 11 April 2013

### A reason for gravity, inertia and mass within an artist theory on the physics of time as a physical process

This video explains gravity as a secondary force to the electromagnetic force.

Newton gave us the Universal Law of Gravitation explaining the inverse square law of gravity. But he never explained why energy should act on gravity in this way.
Then Einstein gave us the General Theory of Relativity explaining a dynamic process. In the General Theory of Relativity when an object moves the curvature of spacetime moves relative to the energy and momentum of the object.

But even in the General Theory of Relativity there is no explanation of why energy and momentum should act on space and time in this way.

In Quantum Atom Theory an artist theory on the physic of time as a physical process we have one continuous and universal process at the quantum level of the atoms.
We see and feel this process as ‘time’ as a physical process of continuous energy exchange that is formed light photon oscillation by light photon oscillation. Objects form their own time by slowing up the rate that time flows relative to their own energy and momentum.
Gravity is not a real force at all object just free-fall towards the greatest energy because it has the greatest time dilation or the slow rate that time flows. In this theory mass is a by-product of time dilation. When time slows down it takes more effort to move an object from A to B this is seen as an increase in mass!

Also Einstein’s equivalence principle between gravity and acceleration falls out of this theory. Because energy and momentum have to increase for an object to accelerate time dilation will increase relative to that acceleration.  Therefore we have equivalence principle between gravity and acceleration this will be felt as inertia in the direction of the acceleration.

But above all this theory gives us an objective understanding of ‘time’ with a past and potential future that we can interact with turning the possible into the actual!

Please rate, subscribe and share as it will help promote this theory!~
﻿

## Monday, 8 April 2013

### Einstein theories of Relativity and Quantum Mechanics within one universal process of continuous creation.

This video has the best images from the Hubble Space Telescope of deep space, galaxies, planetary nebula and star clusters.  The images are overlaid with a theory on the Infinity of Space and Eternity of Time that is based on Einstein theories of Relativity and quantum mechanics.

In this theory we have a universal process of spherical symmetry forming and breaking.

When the spherical symmetry is broken it forms spiral symmetry in the form of the Riemann surface rises up out of the complex plane forming a spiral pattern. Each time we go around the origin 2πi cylindrical symmetry has to be added and we find ourselves on another sheet of the complex plane. There is an infinite order branching point at the origin and also at infinity. The entire spiral pattern is equivalent to a sphere 4π with a single minimum origin formed by spherical symmetry.

The individual observer will see and feel this process of continuous change or energy exchange as the flow of ‘time’ itself with a potential infinity of future possibilities and opportunities.

This one universal process creates the uncertainty of life that is need in the creative process of art, poetry and for the creation of love and beauty.

The uncertainty of choice between love or hate, creativity or destruction is only possible because of this interactive process.
~
﻿

## Friday, 5 April 2013

### Quantum Entanglement or Einstein's spooky action at a distance explained within an artist theory on the physics of ‘Time’ as a physical process.

Video explaining Quantum Entanglement or Einstein's spooky action at a distance.

These are some of questions people have asked me about Quantum Entanglement and Einstein's spooky action and how it is explained by Quantum Atom Theory an artist theory on the physics of ‘time’ as a physical process:

Question:

Nick, I really thought that Einstein referred to the action of quantum entanglement as spooky action at a distance because it was an action that occurs instantaneously. Then the twin particle which forms must know the spin action of the first particle before it is even determined if we go by the speed of light being the measurement of time. So in a sense the spin action would have been already known by the twin particle prior to even being determined. That is why Einstein called it spooky.

Yes instantaneous as in the same moment of time! This is no different than water waves, drop a pebble in a pond and the ripples spread out from their centre forming symmetry over a period of time. It’s the nature of waves the only different is that light wave form the future when they come in contact with something forming new photons in space and new moments in time!  The spacetime of Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity in this theory is formed in this way!

Question:

Then you believe that when the photon(wave) is measured it instantly converts into a particle? I would then assume like in quantum entanglement the information of the source is relayed instantly. It could mean that the photon does not actually travel through the existing wave but is a property of the source and only exists in this dimension(realm) when measured or detected. But this would mean that we cannot see back in time by viewing objects light years away if light happens instantly.

Not at all this theory explains a reason why we can look back in time at the beauty of the stars. The process is continuous forming the continuum of time photon by photon. The photon is also the carrier of the electromagnetic force and in this theory electrical activity in the brain (consciousness) is the most advanced part of this universal process. Therefore we are always in ‘the moment of now’ aware of our own electrical activity in the centre of our own ref-frame being able to look back in time in all directions!

Question:

This explanation is WRONG. This video describes Synchronicity of undisturbed wave functions NOT the phenomena of Quantum﻿ Entanglement . The entangled properties of one when disturbed, instantly (not bound by C) SET A CONDITION of the other regardless of distance. An instant transmission of information unbound by space and time. THIS VIDEO IS NOT AN EXPLANATION OF QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT. No offense intended .

No offence taken! This can explain quantum entanglement the synchronicity of waves is﻿ very similar. The only difference is that in quantum entanglement we have new photons coming into existence that instantly have the same characteristics (spin) of their surrounding spacetime. We see and feel this process as the flow of time itself

Question:

In quantum entanglement if you change the state of one particle you instantly communicate the change(what Einstein called spooky action at a distance) in﻿ waves if you destroy one side you dont communicate any changes to the other side. quantum entanglement is got nothing at all to do with wave synchronization.

Synchronization can also be seen in elementary charge (large scale systems) can be spread over a finite volume whose absolute size may range from that of everyday objects﻿ up to a star or even a large region of interstellar space. Also a collection of more than two charges gives the potential energy of the system as a whole. In this theory the potential energy represents the future potential that we all have within our own ref-frame because the process represents the flow of time itself

Question:

So does observation﻿ break entanglement?

That is a good question I have never worded it like that. I don’t know if break is the right word. Also the eye has to come in contact with light waves to observer therefore it is coming in contact with light a universal physical process not just observations. In this﻿ theory we have a process of symmetry forming and breaking may be you could say the entanglement gets broken!

Question:

But upon observation (light-wave hitting the eye etc) wave-function collapses right? And also the wave-function of the other entangled particle collapses instantly. So﻿ is information transmitted superluminally. Seems like it! So strange...

It should not seem strange if we think of it as a continuous dynamic process that forms the geometry of spacetime. We see﻿ and feel this process as the continuum of time with an Arrow of Time for each individual object or observer within their own ref-frame.

Question:

wow my﻿ brain hurts now So what he was saying is without light there can’t be a universe

There is always light﻿ or electromagnetic radiation it is only that most of it is invisible with our eyes.

Question:

I do agree with the descriptions implication that qm gives an explanation of time that is not present in classical physics. The fact that there is﻿ a direction of time, as well as how time "behaves as if it's reversible"... and can actually be reversible. In qm time is reversible, and events can both rehappen and also happen differently in both directions. if multiple states COULD have led to the current state, when going backward, any of the multiple can be reached.

It ﻿is logical that you should think this! Because there is an infinite number of quantum wave particle functions collapsing and reforming all around us. But each one only works one way in time forming the chaos of life. At each moment in time the quantum wave-particle function collapses with a photon electron coupling. At that moment in time we have matter antimatter annihilation. This will always be in one direction the antimatter is always annihilated forming the arrow of time in that ref-frame.
Question:
I think in a qm view of time time can go forward and backward, and branches in both﻿ directions.

No! Not in this theory Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle﻿ only works one way in time, we can always calculate backwards and workout what the position and momentum was in the past. This makes sense if the Ψ quantum wave-particle function represents the flow of time!
~

In this theory the fundamental difference between Quantum and Classical physics is that Quantum physics represents the forward passage of Time itself
I am an artist and when I create a work of art it takes energy and is a process over a period of time ∆E ∆t ≥ h/2π. There is always uncertainty ∆×∆p×≥h/4π of how the art work will turn out in three dimensional (4π spherical) space the position of the lines and curves π on the canvas. Every movement I make will have to start at the quantum level and will have an uncertainty of momentum and position therefore Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle the same uncertainty we have with any potential future event
This theory is based on just two simple postulates and one equation:
1. The first is that the quantum wave particle function Ψ or probability function explained by Schrödinger's wave equation represents the forward passage of time ∆E ∆t ≥ h/2π forming the Arrow of Time within each reference frame with the future unfolding photon by photon.
2. The second is that Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle ∆×∆p×≥h/4π that is formed by the wave function is the same uncertainty we have with any future event that.
This process of continuous energy exchange continuous creation or change we see and feel as the flow of time itself and can interact with turning the possible into the actual!

This theory is based on just one new equation (E=ˠM˳C²)∞ the Lorentz contraction of space and time is between the energy and mass. The greater the energy the greater the contraction of﻿  space and the slower time will run. Mass will increase relative to this and each ref-frame can be seen as a vortex in space formed by the rate that time flows. C² is light radiating out in all directions forming a sphere that can be squared to form the future probability. The brackets represent the boundary condition of the ref-frame within infinity!