Albert Einstein forming his own potential future uncertainty relative to his position and momentum.

I am on the Web to promote Quantum Atom Theory an artist theory on the physics of time.

This theory is very simple and in based on just two postulates

1. The first is that the quantum wave particle function Ψ explained by Schrödinger’s wave equation represents the forward passage of time ∆E ∆t ≥ h/2π itself

2. The second is that Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle ∆×∆p×≥h/4π that is formed by the w-function is the same uncertainty we have with any future event within our own reference frame.

The quantum wave particle function Ψ will radiate out in a sphere 4π of EMR from its radius forming a square C

^{2 }of probability that we can interact with turning the possible into the actual!

The spherical 4π expansion of the quantum wave particle function Ψ expands in all directions forming the three dimensional space of everyday life. But at each new absorption and emission of light (photon electron coupling C

^{2}) there will be matter antimatter annihilation in just one direction forming the Arrow of Time and a new w-function of potential future probability.

This process forms the continuum of time.

~

Below are some Questions and Answers

*from my videos on YouTube:*
Question:

Who will be there to experience time if thought is absent? How will time exist if so? It is thought that creates time, it is an illusion. It is thought that records what itself names absorption and emission of light and according to its own memory creates the idea of time in relationship to that very same memory. How do we get the 'I' experience?

Answer:

In this theory time is a physical process and would exist even if there was no human thought in the Universe. The absorption and emission of light is also a physical process and can be explained by physics. In the physics of Einstein’s special relativity there are an infinite number of ref-frames. So the ‘I’ can have its own ref-frame relative to its own energy. Even the increase in energy formed by the thinking process will form time dilation within its own ref-frame forming its own ‘time’ that will have the geometry or curvature of spacetime.

Question:

You seem to imply that space and time are independent of each other here. That's fundamentally wrong.

Also, physics does have an explanation for the arrow of time, which is an ever increasing rate of entropy. Entropy, in this case, is best thought of as a change in states of energy (ie, energy dissipates to uniformity). So time measures a change in something, which makes sense (If nothing ever changed, we would never need time).

Also, physics does have an explanation for the arrow of time, which is an ever increasing rate of entropy. Entropy, in this case, is best thought of as a change in states of energy (ie, energy dissipates to uniformity). So time measures a change in something, which makes sense (If nothing ever changed, we would never need time).

Answer:

No in this theory space and time are linked. The spherical 4π expansion of the quantum wave particle function (light) forms Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle ∆×∆p×≥h/4π that is the same uncertainty we have with any future event that we can interact with turning the possible into the actual! The spherical shape of the w-functions forms the low entropy for the ever increasing rate of entropy that no other theory can explain! Nothing can have lower entropy than a sphere!

Question:

What about photon which is self a neutral system (we say its a energy packet) but it moves because of electromagnetic wave. As far as I know energy doesn't have any charges and its a neutral system too...So how photon moves on the basis of electromagnetism?

Answer:

Each new photon oscillation is the centre of new movements in an electromagnetic field. This creates the movement of charge in this theory there is a link between electrical potential and future potential of the observer in their own reference frame. This is because the process represents the flow of time within each ref-frame.

Question:

+1. You state: 'This will have a square C² of probability.'. If here C^2 is the (speed of light)^2, that it is a dimension-full quantity. The probability is dimensionless quantity. A dimensionless quantity can't be equal to a dimensionless quantity. Consequently, you are wrong. Can you explain this?

Answer:

+1. Yes! 'This will have a C² square of probability at each photon electron coupling because you square the radius r² of a sphere 4π to get the surface area, area=4πr². This theory is based on simple geometry and mathematics therefore nothing is truly dimensionless at the heart of chaos we will find symmetry!

Question:

2. You state that 'E=MC² reveals that energy and mass are linked to light'. Of course, light has zero rest mass, and has energy. But why did you choose 'light'? Why do you prefer 'light' again e.g. electrons? Or neutrons? Or neutrinos? What's the difference between your statement 'E=MC² reveals that energy and mass are linked to light' and e. g.: 'E=MC² reveals that energy and mass are linked to copper'?

Answer:

2. Light is chosen because the electrons are bounded to the atoms in the process that forms photon electron couplings C². Light has momentum and it is this momentum that forms each new photon oscillation. Also we can create light interacting with this process. In Quantum Atom Theory the atoms interact with light forming the flow of time even atoms of copper. This process can be explained without neutrons and neutrinos!

Question:

3. You talk about the broken symmetry of electrons. What is the symmetry, they broke? How you mean they broke the symmetry?

Answer:

3. This symmetry is spherical symmetry 4π the electric charge of the electron is spherical. Check out the video ‘Spherical electrons’ by sixty-symbols! (On YouTube) Also this symmetry can be seen in the Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle equation ∆×∆p×≥h/4π and in the spherical shape of the quantum wave particle function. The symmetry of π can even be found in electric charge of free space K=1/4π ɛ˳

Question:

4. You talking a lot, and sometimes you mention some well known and specific physical law. This does not make something to be a theory. What's the prediction of your theory? Please give me at least one, measurable prediction of your theory!

Answer:

4. Yes! But a theory and a physical process that does not work with the law of physics would not be much of a theory. In this theory Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle ∆×∆p×≥h/4π is the same uncertainty we have with any future event within our own ref-frame. We have an infinite ∞ number of ref-frames creating an infinity of possibilities! Therefore the theory predicts you can always ask another question because you have infinite possibilities unmeasurable by man!

In this theory we have an infinity of possibilities formed by the continuum of time that is represented mathematically by Cantor’s Continuum Hypothesis.

~

## No comments:

Post a Comment