## Monday, 24 September 2012

### Hugh Everett Many Worlds Interpretation and the parallel universe paradox

The Many Worlds interpretation is one of the most logical whys of explaining the paradoxes of quantum physics.
This interpretation is based on the mathematics of Hugh Everett in his equations each parallel world branches off at right-angles to each other in some ways this is similar to the branches of a tree.

Therefore we have an infinite number of parallel worlds or universes to our own universe but forever cut off from it.

This forms its own paradox where are the infinite number of parallel Universes in the Many Worlds interpretation?

The theory explained in the video above overcomes this paradox by explaining a process of continuous energy exchange.

The many worlds or parallel universes are just potential future possibilities within our one three dimensional Universe of continuous change continuous creation.

The right angle in the mathematics of Hugh Everett represents the magnetic fields always being at right angles to the electric fields forming electrical potential within each reference frame.

Our Universe is made up of an infinite number of ref-frames with the electrical potential of each ref frame relative to the energy or actions of the object forming the future potential.

This can all be based on just one equation!  The Lorentz contraction of space and time is between the energy and mass. The greater the energy the greater the contraction of space and the slower time will run. Mass will increase relative to this and each ref-frame can be seen as a vortex in space formed by the rate that time flows. The brackets represent the boundary condition of the ref-frame formed by the energy and the infinity symbol represents an infinite number of ref-frames that make up our Universe.

This theory is based on just two simple postulates:

1. Is that the quantum wave particle function Ψ or probability function explained mathematically by Schrödinger’s wave equation represents the forward passage of time itself

2. Is that Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle ∆×∆p×≥h/4π that is formed by the w-function is the same uncertainty we have with any future event within our own ref-frame that we can interact with turning the possible into the actual!
~

#### 1 comment: Anonymous said...

Vеry descгiptive article, I lovеd that bit.
Will thеre bе а part 2?

Chеck out my web-sіte - iphonerepairmalaysia.blog.fc2.com